Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sylvester Andrews, 87-3109 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 87-3109 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 13, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 836 F.2d 1291 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sylvester ANDREWS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-3109. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jan. 13, 1988. Thomas E. Morris, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ernst D. Mueller, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Patty Merkamp Stemler, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Appellate Section/Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Rosemary T. Cakmis, Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the Uni
More

836 F.2d 1291

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sylvester ANDREWS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-3109.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1988.

Thomas E. Morris, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ernst D. Mueller, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Patty Merkamp Stemler, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Appellate Section/Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Rosemary T. Cakmis, Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Howell W. Melton, Judge.ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion October 27, 1987, 11th Cir., 1987, 833 F.2d 1019)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of February 22, 1988, on or hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer